Skip to main content
Firedog
Super User
Super User
February 26, 2024
Solved

Why is my Future Annual Consumption estimate so persistently high?

  • February 26, 2024
  • 86 replies
  • 1895 views

I have just read this passage about FACs in another thread: “… my own experience shows that [the future annual consumption figure] is being based on, (or at least being adjusted based on) actual meter readings. I could see my FAC for gas changing (reducing by large amounts) within minutes of submitting a new meter reading.”

This is what is supposed to happen, if I understand the wording here: Usage projection is a figure produced by our billing system, that uses smart meter readings (if available) to project the usage for you over the next year.

We clearly have a two-tier system: an ineffectual one for smart meter customers, and another better one for everyone else. Those who submit manual readings 'see their FAC changing within minutes.' Those of us with smart meters are apparently subject to a system which can take months to adjust the FAC to actual usage, despite having meter readings recorded automatically every day.

My own (electricity only) FAC got stuck last year after a meter adjustment. I was told last year, as was the Ombudsman, that it would all come right after a meter exchange, which happened in September. There was no change to my FAC until mid-November, when it suddenly started falling from its figure of 2.35 times the actual annual usage. This is how it has progressed, from its stubbornly-maintained figure of 2902.9 where it had been since the previous April:

 

 

I can't explain the hiatus in early January, unless there was some manual intervention. The figures are updated every Sunday, and occasionally midweek: there have been 16 updates since 5 November. If manual intervention is possible, then there’s no need to rely solely on this clearly flawed system.

I suppose I should be grateful that my FAC is now only 76% higher than my actual consumption for the past year. Excel tells me that if both curves proceed at the same rate, they will eventually meet on 8 August next, just one year after OVO assured the Ombudsman and me that a meter exchange would soon solve the problem.

For those of us with multi-rate tariffs (e.g. Economy 7), there have to be FAC figures for peak and offpeak usage. It’s the ratio between these that determines how economical the tariff is, so it’s also important that this ratio is also accurate. It’s not, for me. Not only is any Direct Debit calculation worthless, but so are projected costs when trying to compare tariffs. 

There is something seriously wrong with the FAC determination if it can't adapt more quickly to actual, readily-available meter-confirmed data as Ofgem mandates and as Tim maintains it should.

Best answer by Firedog

Updated on 15/08/25 by Emmanuelle_OVO:

 I’ve now (courtesy of @ChristopherS_OVO - thanks!) had some actual figures for the calculation of my FAC, and they’re as clear as an early-morning midstream sample. I learnt a few things, though:

  • The EAC is indeed allegedly updated to reflect data shared by the supplier. If that sharing fails for some reason - and it clearly did in my case - the EAC reverts to a default value, subsequently adjusted for whatever data have been successfully shared since the fault. 
  • I can’t for the life of me work out where these default values come from. I’m told they are for a ‘typical E7 user’. So no attempt at all to take into account the factors that Uswitch and comparethemarket say are used to match the EAC to the user’s household [“central industry sources including the Retail Energy Code Company … estimate your consumption over the next 12 months based on a number of factors about your property and based on your property’s historical consumption.Your usage comparison is based on your energy usage compared to other households in your postcode region. Your usage will be affected by a number of factors including the size of your home and the number of people who live there.”]
  • Meter readings are thus used to adjust the EAC from its initial default value, but this can only happen of course if OVO successfully submit readings. This seems to be where the fault is in my case.
  • OVO then generates an FAC from the current reading and the current EAC, the proportions of each depending on the time elapsed since Week 0. By Week 52, the EAC proportion will be 0 and the meter advance 100%. 
  • It’s impossible for me to work out how the EAC is adjusted when a reading is submitted, but I suspect it’s a similar arrangement.* This being the case, the FAC should approach parity with the meter advance before the year is up. How long before is a mystery, but it’s not likely to be nine months before.
  • I can see no reason why OVO can’t generate a more accurate FAC if it’s clear that the EAC is wrong. OK, this would involve manual intervention, which they understandably try to avoid. However, I’m sure it would have taken much less effort on their part just to do this rather than involve at least five different employees in trying (and failing) to explain why it went wrong for me in the first place.
     

[I just realized after reading this through, though, that this was the sort of approach Fujitsu took when faults appeared in bits of their Post Office Horizon system. I won’t draw any more parallels ...] 
    



*   If it were a similar arrangement (the EAC value changing pro rata with the meter advance over a fixed period), then we’d end up with a second-order function which would give a parabolic curve if the actual consumption was lower than expected. Something like this (I know how you all love my pretty charts 🙂):
  

 

86 replies

Newcomer
October 4, 2025

For clarity my angst is directed at OVO’s method of calculation and the limits imposed by their systems.

I appreciate ​@Firedog  giving out this information and helping us all understand a little bit more about how this algorithm works.

I’m sure in 12 months time the FAC will have stabilised, however knowing why, does not solve the problem.

OVO have my usage information from 2019 when we were moved over from SSE when we were locked in for the first 12 months with fixed DD that put me over £900 in credit.

Once those 12 months were up I more or less set the DD myself to keep the balance sensible but now that is not possible.

The minimum I can pay today is 60% more than I was paying this time last year.

I would have no issue if the algorithm recommended an amount which as a customer in good standing I could adjust, given that I have a clear vision of any changes that might affect my consumption:

Boiler explodes? - get the electric fires back down from the attic.
Going in a cruise? - shut everything off for a month.
Junior gives you a hot tub? - the gift that keeps on taking :(

Alternatively - now here’s a radical idea - why can’t OVO use the data from the smart meter to charge for the energy we use, every month, by Direct Debit, like normal companies.

I did ask - but apparently OVO cannot do this.




 

Newcomer
October 4, 2025

As I refused to change my DD to their inflated amount, OVO cancelled my DD and moved me to demand billing so I can’t access that data.

It does show how OVO expects my consumption to increase over the winter and I’m certain that it’s this assumption that is throwing everything off.

 

For anyone else in this hole, yes - OVO can send you a bill, currently quarterly but I hear they are moving everyone over to monthly soon.

Problems solved? Not really.

Apart from the dire warnings about the consequences of missing a payment (immediately sent to collections) they omitted to inform me that my unit cost would increase by 5.6% and the standing charge by 13.8% - fair enough.

Oh yeah, since they cancelled my Direct Debit, I get a daily call from a call center wanting to speak to me about my OVO account and asking me security questions.

Given this is a cold call from number flagged as suspicious online I have so far refused to provide any information, but when I spoke to OVO yesterday, they confirmed that 0117 374 6078 is the number used by “collections”
 

Firedog
Super User
FiredogSuper UserAuthor
Super User
October 4, 2025

I’m afraid you’re not making it easy for anyone to help you or make reasonable suggestions. Having the Direct Debit cancelled would have moved you on to the On Demand tariff, which as you discovered is significantly more expensive. The typical consumer using 5400 kWh a year would see a difference of £108 for the satisfaction of not having to pay by Direct Debit. All of OVO’s tariffs are laid out on the Our prices page.

“… OVO expects my consumption to increase over the winter and I’m certain that it’s this assumption that is throwing everything off.” Wrong. OVO simply shows how the typical household’s usage varies month by month. Yours isn’t typical, so your costs won’t vary in the same way. This doesn’t affect how the cost for a whole year is estimated. I specified in my last reply the factors that do affect this estimate. The meter readings I suggested you find would have made it possible to reconstruct the estimate you’re seeing.

Not engaging with OVO’s collections department isn’t likely to make life any easier for you.  

If you’re not prepared to play according to your supplier’s rules, you should perhaps consider switching to a supplier that you find more amenable.

Noel | I have no official status; I'm just a volunteer who comes here to help other customers. My gear: Aclara SGM 1416-B Electricity-only E7 meter; Chameleon IHD3-PPMID-AAA | It may look as if I know what I’m talking about, but don’t let that fool you. |
Ben_OVO
Community Manager
Community Manager
October 6, 2025

@gtg it could be the case that the figures held within our systems for your Annual Consumption (EAC) are incorrect.

 

My advice here is to contact the Support Team and request that they use the Annual Consumption Calculator (an internal tool we use) to manually calculate your EAC. They can then enter your tariff rates into this tool, and it will tell them how much your Direct Debit needs to be. If the EAC held within our systems is wrong, they can amend your Direct Debit to what it needs to be, and also raise a case to our Settlements back office to get the EAC updated.

 

Let us know how you get on!

 

 

Powered by the Sun
Rank 2
October 7, 2025

Left OVO yesterday because they absolutely refused to listen and insisted they would not lower my direct debit below £420 a month from the current £450

I explained repeatedly that this was based on last winter consumption which included using storage heaters which were removed over the summer.

I then got a random lecture about they decide my amount, why was I struggling to pay my bills (I’m not) and if I try to change suppliers I will have to pass a credit check. Since when did an energy company get to dictate the amount they take and you become a cash machine for them 

Firedog
Super User
FiredogSuper UserAuthor
Super User
October 7, 2025

…  they would not lower my direct debit below £420 a month from the current £450
   

I’m sorry to hear this. By my reckoning, the online temporary reduction would have brought your DD down below £420 - did you not try this?

Noel | I have no official status; I'm just a volunteer who comes here to help other customers. My gear: Aclara SGM 1416-B Electricity-only E7 meter; Chameleon IHD3-PPMID-AAA | It may look as if I know what I’m talking about, but don’t let that fool you. |
Newcomer
October 8, 2025

@Firedog I have been in this property for 29 years, never switched supplier, always submitted readings on time, never missed a payment and always been in credit.

 

OVO replaced my "expired" traditional meter over the summer, possibly explaining why none of the information requested was visible in my account and possibly resetting the forecast model.

 

It would make sense if my higher than normal summer use was used as the starting point of the typical annual consumption curve while the algorithm was is it’s 12 month “learning” mode.

 

I'm not sure if the erroneous involvement of "collections" for which OVO have now apologised (thank you) triggered something, but at the weekend, my minimum Direct Debit jumped from £215 to £255 even though my September bill came in, as I expected, at less than half of that amount and FAC was indeed slowly dropping.

 

Since it is no longer possible to set your Direct Debit below the suggested minimum online – that gives me a problem, if the game is - OVO picks a number and I hold out my wallet - nope - I'm not playing.

 

@Ben_OVO  A customer shouldn't need intimate knowledge of the internal workings used to drive your forecast model, although since I became aware of EAC on here and found the value for Future Energy Consumption shown in my Plan to be much higher than expected, I have called in to discuss this anomaly so either agents don't know about this yet or if they do, don't have a process to deal issues around it.

 

Anyway - in my view OVO have no excuse, after 6 years, for not understanding my usage pattern, it should, by now, just work, and since it clearly doesn't - I'm voting with me feet.

 

As of today I am also no longer a customer of OVO energy.

Newcomer
October 8, 2025

For anyone puzzled about how 29 years became 6 years - 3.5 million customer were moved from SSE to OVO in 2019…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49686218
 

Firedog
Super User
FiredogSuper UserAuthor
Super User
October 8, 2025

​OVO replaced my "expired" traditional meter over the summer …  possibly resetting the forecast model … OVO have no excuse, after 6 years, for not understanding my usage pattern, 
  

If you had mentioned the recent meter exchange earlier, I’d have been able to tell you that while the EAC calculation is normally based on historical usage data, installing a new meter does indeed reset the estimate. This happened to me a couple of years ago, and it was many months before I eventually learnt this sad fact. My EAC was summarily set to the consumption of a typical household, about three times my actual annual consumption. 

I hope you’ve done your sums carefully to ensure you’re going to be better off with your new supplier. I wonder if they’ll be as hidebound by national rules as OVO seem to be.

Noel | I have no official status; I'm just a volunteer who comes here to help other customers. My gear: Aclara SGM 1416-B Electricity-only E7 meter; Chameleon IHD3-PPMID-AAA | It may look as if I know what I’m talking about, but don’t let that fool you. |
Newcomer
October 8, 2025

Sorry, the significance of the meter change didn’t occur to me until today, given I didn’t ask for it and I assumed that OVO, as custodian of my years of consumption data, would apply some sort of continuance.

  • To "carry forward consumption data for billing" involves collecting historical or ongoing data, often from smart meters, to accurately bill for services like energy or water. For a business, this means having a system to access and share meter reads between wholesalers and retailers. Consumers typically need to provide regular manual readings or have smart meters installed to ensure their consumption data is accurate and prevent estimated, and potentially inaccurate, bills. 

 

  • Key steps to ensure accurate billing:
  • Install Smart Meters: These provide automatic, accurate readings and eliminate the need for manual submissions.
  • Provide Regular Readings: If you don't have a smart meter, submit readings as frequently as possible (e.g., quarterly).
  • Monitor Your Usage: Use the data available (often via your online portal) to understand your consumption patterns and identify potential savings.
  • Report Issues: If your estimated annual consumption figures are incorrect, contact your supplier, who can use your recent readings to create a more accurate short-term figure.

I did all of the above.

The thing that breaks this is the customers inability to set a sensible payment level. If the system had suggested £215 and I had been able to drop that down to £120 I would still be here. From memory it used to give dire warnings about the consequences of not paying enough but has morphed into “computer says no”.