Skip to main content
Jeffus
Rank 20
Rank 20
February 7, 2023

The new Department for Energy Security and Net Zero - what should they prioritise?

  • February 7, 2023
  • 16 replies
  • 207 views

A new government department. 

What should they prioritise? 

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/making-government-deliver-for-the-british-people

"A new Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, has been tasked with securing our long-term energy supply, bringing down bills and halving inflation. The move recognises the significant impact rising prices have had on households across the country as a result of Putin’s illegal war in Ukraine, and the need to secure more energy from domestic nuclear and renewable sources as we seize the opportunities of net zero."

16 replies

February 7, 2023

Any project that promotes and brings about the growth of our country is most welcome. Especially the development of technology to reduce the use of fossil fuels. Perhaps we could ask Gordon Brown for a donation, as he was the one who told us all to buy diesel vehicles. Myself included.

February 7, 2023
  • The REA cautiously welcomes the creation of the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero;  
  • Government must now prioritise collaboration, urgency and certainty, if the new department is to deliver on its goals;
  • Recognition of both the climate and energy crises welcome, and the REA look forward to working alongside this department to rapidly scale up renewable energy and clean technology investment and deployment.
Tim_OVO
OVO Staff
OVO Forum Legend
February 8, 2023

I wonder how much investment goes into research and development of nuclear fusion? In 2020 it was £356mil

 

What does the group feel about on-shore wind? 

 

 

Carbon neutral - we need a community to get there! My green tech: Aclara SGM 1411-B smart meter, Chameleon IHD6
February 8, 2023

With right investment and public agreement I think that both offshore and onshore wind are definitely projects for the future.

Also the advancement of the nuclear industry is, for me, a must. As it happens I worked in the nuclear industry for nearly 14yrs. A lot of people still think the industry is not safe. This is no longer the case. Most concerns are about waste. Of course there will always be some form of nuclear industry as long as we need nuclear weapons but that’s a debate for another place.

Jeffus
Rank 20
JeffusAuthor
Rank 20
February 8, 2023

I don't have a problem with onshore wind.

It is quick to install (depending on local electricity connections) 

If we build the turbines in the right place we should be able to better match local supply and demand.

We do need to be careful when they are too close to homes obviously. 

I don't have a problem in green field areas personally.

 

Firedog
Super User
Super User
February 8, 2023

What does the group feel about on-shore wind? 

 

I’m all in favour. 

Centuries ago, the landscape was dotted with working windmills. Most of them collapsed after falling into disuse, and now we spend lots of sparse cultural funds on restoring and maintaining the few that are left. Were they considered an eyesore in their heyday?

The noise can be a problem, but this country’s big enough to accommodate plenty of turbines where none of them is within a quarter of a mile of human inhabitation. We also used to see wind-driven water pumps all around the fields here in rural Lincolnshire - I wonder what happened to them?

Perhaps we’re moving towards more local energy-security solutions. The hamlet where I live consists of a manor house, a handful of other dwellings and a load of farm buildings. I could envisage a wind turbine beside and solar panels on the roofs of those barns, coupled with a battery inside one of them powering the whole community completely off-grid. The estate is already considering converting the diesel-powered farm machinery to run off rapeseed oil, one of its main crops these days. All it would take is for the investment costs to come down a lot 😉

 

Noel | I have no official status; I'm just a volunteer who comes here to help other customers. My gear: Aclara SGM 1416-B Electricity-only E7 meter; Chameleon IHD3-PPMID-AAA | It may look as if I know what I’m talking about, but don’t let that fool you. |
February 8, 2023

Yes, that's why I mentioned with public agreement. There are a whole range of issues involved in siting both at sea and shore. 

Jeffus
Rank 20
JeffusAuthor
Rank 20
February 8, 2023

Latest priorities from their website

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero will provide dedicated leadership focused on delivering security of energy supply, ensuring properly functioning markets, greater energy efficiency and seizing the opportunities of net zero to lead the world in new green industries.

This year, the department will focus on easing the cost of living and delivering financial security by bringing down energy bills and keeping them down - better insulating consumers from external impacts. Longer term objectives include ensuring properly functioning energy markets, coordinating net zero objectives across government and bringing external delivery expertise to bear on its portfolio of major projects.

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero is focused on the energy portfolio from the former Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS).

juliamc
Rank 20
Rank 20
February 8, 2023

Shame they haven’t mentioned insulating the housing stock. Not very glamorous I suppose? Also more training of heating engineers, auditing existing installations and improving the electricity grid. I hope these are in the BEIS portfolio along with our heat pump trial.

I’d love a wind turbine locally. The countryside is peppered with phone masts which people hate but get used to.