Skip to main content
Rank 1
October 2, 2026
Question

What do you do when advisors just don't reply?

  • October 2, 2026
  • 4 replies
  • 40 views

Through the ombudsman OVO said it was going to use an estimated reading. Asked me to say whether I was ok with that which obviously i was given the actual reading belonged to the previous tenant. They gave me an estimated reading that was higher than my average use, even though I provided evidence that I wasnt even in the flat half the month. Disgraceful. And now because the Ombudsman have technically done their part, and a resolution, albeit a iseless one, has been achieved, Ovo refuse to deal with me because I accepted an offer that didnt even show the final bill. Cretins.

4 replies

Nukecad
Super User
Super User
October 3, 2026

Once again I’m a bit confused by your post, is this in anyway related to your previous posts about the app?

https://forum.ovoenergy.com/the%2Darchive%2D149/can%2Dt%2Dtop%2Dup%2Donline%2Dwhat%2Dcan%2Di%2Ddo%2Dinstead%2Dto%2Dtop%2Dup%2D16048/index3.html?postid=153632#post153632

In that thread you state that you have a credit meter and pay monthly, 

Are you complaining that the meter reading used for when you moved in is wrong?
(You should always photograph the meter readings when moving in and when moving out, that;s your proof if there is any dispute later).

Or are you complaining again about the estimated usage?
Estimated usage will get corrected by supplying actual readings,

What did you complain to the Ombudsman about, and what was the ombudsman’s ruling?

Two things to consider:

Firstly the previous tenant’s moving out meter reading may be quite a bit lower then your moving in reading.
For instance if the landlord has had work dome on the property during the tenancy void, that work will have used electricity. There will also be daily standing charges building up.
(Of course the landlord should pay for any energy used and standing charges during any tenancy void, but not all landlords do).

Secondly even after you had the tenancy, if you were away from the flat the heating may still have been on using energy, and the daily standing charges still need to be paid.

I said, Hey - Watts going on.
Rank 1
October 3, 2026

Ovo had to install new smart meters. They scheduled a day of installation. I made the mistake of not photographing the reading the day I moved in. I accept that. What I don't accept is Ovo using an estimate for that first month that means I am paying higher than my average monthly consumption for a period I spent half the time even not moved in.

 

There were no white goods to consume electricity.

 

The boiler wasn't turned on for half the month until I moved in. So no heating or gas cooking.

 

The landlord didn't do anything between tenancies. There was no changes to the property. It's a cupboard of a flat.

 

There was no consumption for the period i hadnt yet moved in. Standing charge, sure. I am complaining about the estimated start reading for the beginning of the tenancy, which obviously led to such a high reading when they took the final reading of the previous meter. I am not in control of the estimate, that was Ovo, and despite providing evidence I wasn't there I was screwed.

 

The original bill before the final readings had been confirmed was even higher and included the previous tenant's bill. That's why I went to the Ombudsman, because the promises of it getting resolved lasted weeks then months.

 

The title of my comment is "What do you do when advisors dont reply". Because it seems that having tricked me to acceot an estimated figure without knowing what amount it will actually lead to, Ovo now refuse to address the injustice. Or is it standard practice to ignore emails? Frustrated. Researching cheaper companies, used to be with Octopus and never had this problem.

Nukecad
Super User
Super User
October 3, 2026

You say that you went to the Ombudsman, but you don't say what was the Ombudsman decision/ruling?

(You can still go to court, at your own cost, if you don't agree with the ombudsman decision. However be warned that the court will usually (nearly always) agree with the ombudsman decision).

I said, Hey - Watts going on.
Rank 1
October 3, 2026

The Ombudsman ruled in my favour and ordered Ovo to do their job and charge me appropriately after months of Ovo telling me to wait and ignore the previous tenants debt showing up as my bill. Despite the monthly ovo debt warning emails despite a hold apparently being in my account.Ovo also had to pay £100 as a pathetic goodwill payment for the hours I wasted on their phonelines. I already said ovo had offered an estimate reading which gave me no indication of how much money that bill would be. So my advice to anyone, if Ovo offers you something through the ombudsman, don't take it, not until they tell you what that will actually cost you. It's dishonest and shows the lack of morals of the cretins that work there. The Ombudsman just forced them to try and rectify it, it didnt rule the reading was correct that ovo was offering, they just refused to reopen the case because id initially accepted it. Right now the app doesnt even match the readings they have to me privately, the app shows estimates as given readings, just a complete mess. Had I the money i'd take them to court, I'd make the dishonest bastards cry and have them all fired.