There are various discussions about reducing carbon emissions and many ( or most?) refer to net zero .. but .. it that the best target?
We already see the effect of global warming on climate and depending on your situation, that can already have an effect on life.
More often than not, most refer to a Net Zero target which in effect ‘levels’ the rise but does little to reduce warming. This then moves to ‘Sub Net Zero’ so that some reduction is expected but probably not for quite a number of years.
And finally, Zero emissions meaning that nature can really begin to work its magic and repair the planet.
Should the aim be to reach net zero, sub net zero or zero carbon emissions?
Reply
Log in to the OVO Forum
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.